Technology perimeter
Map critical applications, architecture, vendors, licences, service dependencies and technical ownership.
Scope the review of systems, software, data, intellectual property and cyber resilience around the acquisition thesis and the intended operating model.
Scope the review of systems, software, data, intellectual property and cyber resilience around the acquisition thesis and the intended operating model.
Start with the decision you need to make, your role and authority, target sectors and markets, ticket range, timing and the information available. The engagement scope should identify the work Matchpoint undertakes and any independently appointed specialist work.
Map critical applications, architecture, vendors, licences, service dependencies and technical ownership.
Request evidence of data permissions, code and model ownership, access rights and contractual restrictions.
Agree the specialist assessment, permitted testing, incident evidence, remediation priorities and reliance rights.
Translate verified findings into integration dependencies, required investment, decision conditions and ownership.
Technology diligence scoping diagnostic; systems and data evidence map; specialist workplan; transaction risk register.
Discuss this engagementProvide the mandate or investment thesis, authorised decision-makers, existing adviser appointments, available financial and operating information, constraints, timing and the specific decision requiring support.
Before engagement, confirm the named delivery lead, relevant experience, permitted references, specialist qualifications, document access and sample deliverable structure. Any transaction or performance claim requires verifiable source evidence and permission to use it.
Technical assessments and cyber testing require named specialist capability, written permission and a defined testing perimeter. Access to systems, data or personal information follows the agreed security and confidentiality controls.
Define the scope for the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman and any wider international market relevant to the mandate. Assess local ownership, investment, promotion, data, tax and execution requirements with qualified advisers. Country references describe the intended assessment scope.
Explore the participants and transaction options relevant to this practice. Each entry sets out a discussion scope, decision checks, a paid engagement starting point and the specialist responsibilities to confirm.
Mandate context: diligence, risk transfer, documentation and transaction administration. The structure and rights are established by the specific transaction documents.
Decision focus: Qualified providers and clear responsibility boundaries.
Scope to discuss: Adviser selection, diligence coordination and transaction workstream management.
Paid engagement entry point: adviser-scope and diligence-workplan diagnostic; followed by coordinated workstream delivery.
Illustrative GCC scenario: An illustrative GCC transaction can assign legal, tax, technical, insurance and administration work to the appropriate providers and connect their findings through one decision log. This is a hypothetical decision example.
Define the investment or transaction objective, the authorised decision-maker, the evidence available, the requested deliverables and the next approval. Use the decision checks above to identify gaps; agree the workplan, delivery responsibilities and fee terms in writing.
Delivery and specialist boundary: Agree the provider, qualifications, independence, permission, reliance rights and scope before appointment. Matchpoint's scope can cover adviser selection and transaction coordination. Legal, tax, audit, engineering, insurance, custody, administration, ratings and other specialist conclusions require the appropriately qualified and appointed provider.
Discuss a paid scopeMandate context: diligence, risk transfer, documentation and transaction administration. The structure and rights are established by the specific transaction documents.
Decision focus: Qualified providers and clear responsibility boundaries.
Scope to discuss: Adviser selection, diligence coordination and transaction workstream management.
Paid engagement entry point: adviser-scope and diligence-workplan diagnostic; followed by coordinated workstream delivery.
Illustrative GCC scenario: An illustrative GCC transaction can assign legal, tax, technical, insurance and administration work to the appropriate providers and connect their findings through one decision log. This is a hypothetical decision example.
Define the investment or transaction objective, the authorised decision-maker, the evidence available, the requested deliverables and the next approval. Use the decision checks above to identify gaps; agree the workplan, delivery responsibilities and fee terms in writing.
Delivery and specialist boundary: Agree the provider, qualifications, independence, permission, reliance rights and scope before appointment. Matchpoint's scope can cover adviser selection and transaction coordination. Legal, tax, audit, engineering, insurance, custody, administration, ratings and other specialist conclusions require the appropriately qualified and appointed provider.
Discuss a paid scopeFurther reading on diligence, market frameworks and applicable requirements. These resources do not verify an individual mandate or Matchpoint permission.
Technology diligence scoping diagnostic; systems and data evidence map; specialist workplan; transaction risk register.
Technical assessments and cyber testing require named specialist capability, written permission and a defined testing perimeter. Access to systems, data or personal information follows the agreed security and confidentiality controls. Agree the deliverables, named providers, timetable, evidence access and fee terms in writing before work begins.