Joint Ventures & Preferred Equity
JV structuring and preferred equity with landowners and capital partners.
Real estate joint ventures and preferred equity combine land, capital and development expertise into shared structures, sharing risk and reward — with preferred equity offering priority returns. Matchpoint structures JVs and preferred-equity deals between landowners, developers and capital partners.
As part of our Real Estate Financing practice, Matchpoint Partners has originated and led $2+ billion of transactions across four continents, and every real estate financing mandate is led by a partner, from first call to close.
A real estate joint venture combines land, capital and development expertise from different partners into a single structure, sharing risk and reward. It lets a landowner participate in development upside rather than selling outright, and gives capital partners access to a developer's pipeline and execution capability.
Matchpoint Partners structures JVs between landowners, developers and capital partners — handling SPV documentation, governance, contribution, deadlock and exit provisions — across land acquisition and development across the UAE, KSA, India and the UK.
Our role on joint ventures & preferred equity mandates
- JV and SPV structuring
- Preferred equity with priority returns
- Landowner, developer and capital pairing
- Governance, deadlock and exit terms
Select transactions
Representative real estate financing mandates led by Matchpoint partners.
Project capital — equity & debt for a named UAE project.
Bangalore land bank — agri-to-commercial conversion + JV.
Research relevant to this area
Original analysis and decision frameworks from the Matchpoint team.
Joint Ventures & Preferred Equity — frequently asked questions
Partners contribute land, capital or expertise into an SPV and share returns per agreed terms.
Equity with a priority return ahead of common equity, sitting between debt and ordinary equity.
The land is appraised at agreed market value and credited as the landowner’s equity in the SPV, alongside the capital partner’s cash. Returns are then shared in proportion to those contributions, adjusted for who carries development risk and who manages delivery. Independent valuation avoids disputes later.
Most institutional partners expect a distribution waterfall: return of capital first, then a preferred return on it, then a promote that rewards the developer for outperformance. The exact tiers are negotiated around project risk, leverage and who controls execution decisions.
When the senior lender restricts additional debt or the security package is already fully committed. Preferred equity sits in the ownership structure rather than the debt stack, so it avoids intercreditor friction and covenant breaches, in exchange for a priority return ahead of the common equity.
Matchpoint structures the full capital stack for UAE developers — senior secured debt, mezzanine with LandCo control, project finance, land acquisition finance, Sukuk and private credit, plus JV equity and bulk inventory sales. Tickets range from USD 5m to USD 500m+.
Land acquisition finance is bridge or term debt to fund the purchase of development land before construction. We arrange programmes — including Sukuk and private credit at ~8.5%–12% target yields — for developers in Yas Island, Reem Island, SZR and Dubai Islands.
A bulk inventory sale is the disposal of a block of completed or off-plan units to a single investor or institution at a negotiated discount. We run bulk SPA, OQOOD assignment and milestone-payment processes for developers seeking liquidity.
Engagements ordinarily combine a retainer with a success fee. Terms are agreed in writing before work begins and calibrated to the mandate’s size, scope and complexity.
Most mandates reach a first term sheet within 30 days, depending on diligence readiness and structure; closing follows once terms are agreed.
A short, confidential scoping call and NDA; we structure the requirement and prepare materials, then run a competitive process across our 5,000+ investor and lender relationships, and negotiate to close — with a partner leading at every step.
Matchpoint Partners is based in the UAE and runs cross-border mandates across the UAE, KSA, India and the UK, with active deal activity in wider Europe, Singapore and the United States.
Matchpoint undertakes corporate finance, financing, M&A and fund-placement mandates from USD 5m upwards, subject to mandate fit, diligence, applicable regulation, capacity and a written engagement. The partner team has originated and led $2+ billion of transactions.
Use the enquiry form, email contact@matchpoint-partners.com, or call/WhatsApp +971 52 345 1119. Every mandate is led by a partner from the very first conversation.
Yes. Confidential information is handled under the engagement terms and any applicable non-disclosure agreement.
More in Real Estate Financing
Interested in joint ventures & preferred equity?
Tell us your requirement and a partner will respond personally.
Matchpoint decision framework
Developer and investor decisions in a project JV
Editorial update: 2026-09-07
A project joint venture should explain both the developer’s execution responsibilities and the investor’s economic and governance rights. The same headline ownership split can sit above very different cash-flow arrangements. Use a shared model and a written issues list to expose those differences before a term sheet is treated as settled.
Contributions and valuation
Identify land, cash, existing work and future services separately. Record when each contribution is due and the evidence supporting its value. Examine what happens if a contribution is delayed or disputed. A model should show financing costs, development fees and other payments before the residual profit split is compared.
Control and downside
List decisions requiring consent, including budget changes, additional borrowing, related-party contracts, sales policy and changes to the business plan. Model cost overruns and delayed completion alongside cash distributions. Preferred-equity terms may alter priorities and control triggers; their actual effect depends on the agreed documentation and should receive specialist review.
Exit and implementation
Compare sale, refinancing and buyout assumptions, including what happens if the intended exit is unavailable. Assign responsibility for reporting, tax coordination and dispute procedures. A transaction can be commercially attractive while still containing unresolved implementation conditions. Make these conditions visible and define the approval needed before capital is committed.
Decision preparation checklist
- Contribution schedule and valuation evidence
- Fees and distribution waterfall
- Reserved matters and related-party controls
- Cost-overrun funding responsibilities
- Exit alternatives and unresolved conditions
Practical questions
Does a 50:50 ownership split mean equal economics?
Not necessarily. Contributions, fees, payment priorities, funding obligations and contractual rights can produce different economic outcomes.
Is preferred equity equivalent to a secured loan?
Do not assume equivalence. Review the actual rights, payment terms, ranking and remedies with qualified advisers.
Related decision paths
Discuss your decision with Matchpoint
Start with a non-confidential brief covering the objective, jurisdictions, current stage, timing and open decisions. Any engagement is subject to fit, jurisdictional review, written scope and agreed fees. Please do not submit confidential third-party information through a public form.
Request a mandate discussionFounder credentials: Chennakeshav (CK) Adya
This paper is part of a continuing series on the structure of private and alternative markets. The views expressed are the author's own. The paper is for information only, describes market structure in general terms, and does not constitute investment, legal, tax or regulatory advice or a recommendation in respect of any security, vehicle or counterparty.
