Who leads the legal relationship?
The client instructs its law firm for legal advice and representation. The financial and process-support team works within the agreed scope and coordinates its deliverables with the legal team.
MatchPoint coordinates financial and execution workstreams alongside a client's restructuring lawyers. The proposed scope can include valuation, liquidation comparisons, financial plan reports, creditor information and funding coordination, with the instructed law firm retaining responsibility for legal advice and the legal file.
This service is intended for law firms advising a business, lender or stakeholder that needs specialist financial execution capacity. The instruction is scoped around the client, the legal procedure, independence requirements and the practical work the case team needs delivered.
Share a non-confidential case outline, the proposed client and instruction, the relevant jurisdictions and the required workstreams. Complete conflict checks and agree confidentiality arrangements, data access and the financial scope before detailed materials are exchanged.
The client instructs its law firm for legal advice and representation. The financial and process-support team works within the agreed scope and coordinates its deliverables with the legal team.
The proposed instruction is assessed for conflicts, independence, capability and jurisdiction. The client, scope and respective roles are agreed before an assignment is accepted.
The fee proposal reflects the agreed financial work, complexity, information requirements and delivery responsibilities. Any platform licence and implementation scope are specified separately.
Start with a non-confidential overview. Detailed documents can follow the agreed conflict-check and information-sharing process.
Discuss a restructuring briefEngagements are subject to conflict, capability and jurisdiction checks. Client-appointed counsel directs legal advice, filings and court procedure. Financing, creditor support and court decisions depend on the relevant parties and applicable requirements. Delivery responsibilities, advisory fees and any platform licence are confirmed in the engagement scope.
Explore the participants and transaction options relevant to this practice. Each entry sets out a discussion scope, decision checks, a paid engagement starting point and the specialist responsibilities to confirm.
Mandate context: private sale, acquisition, restructuring and secondary transactions. The structure and rights are established by the specific transaction documents.
Decision focus: Transaction route, value and execution dependencies.
Scope to discuss: Transaction route assessment, process design and execution support.
Paid engagement entry point: transaction-route feasibility study; followed by process design and execution.
Illustrative GCC scenario: An illustrative cross-border GCC carve-out can compare the sale perimeter, standalone readiness, valuation and separation dependencies before selecting a transaction route. This is a hypothetical decision example.
Define the investment or transaction objective, the authorised decision-maker, the evidence available, the requested deliverables and the next approval. Use the decision checks above to identify gaps; agree the workplan, delivery responsibilities and fee terms in writing.
Delivery and specialist boundary: Confirm decision authority, evidence access, conflicts, scope and applicable jurisdiction-specific permissions before execution. Legal, tax, fund-marketing, securities and Shariah questions require the relevant appointed specialist. Capital availability, investment returns and execution dates remain subject to assessment.
Discuss a paid scopeMandate context: capital raising, M&A, debt and special situations mandates. The structure and rights are established by the specific transaction documents.
Decision focus: A defined scope and a reviewable decision record.
Scope to discuss: Adviser selection, diligence coordination and transaction workstream management.
Paid engagement entry point: adviser-scope and diligence-workplan diagnostic; followed by coordinated workstream delivery.
Illustrative GCC scenario: An illustrative UAE acquisition advisory scope can define the transaction lead, decision gates, diligence providers, deliverable ownership and written fee terms. This is a hypothetical decision example.
Define the investment or transaction objective, the authorised decision-maker, the evidence available, the requested deliverables and the next approval. Use the decision checks above to identify gaps; agree the workplan, delivery responsibilities and fee terms in writing.
Delivery and specialist boundary: Agree the provider, qualifications, independence, permission, reliance rights and scope before appointment. Matchpoint's scope can cover adviser selection and transaction coordination. Legal, tax, audit, engineering, insurance, custody, administration, ratings and other specialist conclusions require the appropriately qualified and appointed provider.
Discuss a paid scopeFurther reading on diligence, market frameworks and applicable requirements. These resources do not verify an individual mandate or Matchpoint permission.